Back

Haptic Intelligence Members Publications

Haptic Feedback and Autonomous Reflexes for Upper-limb Prostheses

The studied task required the user to pick up and move the metal cylinder using a myoelectric prosthesis in the absence of direct vision. (a) Ottobock SensorHand Speed featuring custom-built contact-location and pressure sensors. (b) Experimental setup including an adapter and counterbalance weights to allow use by non-amputee individuals. (c) Traces of select signals from a participant who received vibrotactile feedback and used the prosthesis with reflexes enabled. From top to bottom: raw and reflex-modulated motor command to close the prosthetic hand, hand aperture, pressure sensor, contact-location sensor, current to vibrotactor, and lastly, the distance of the object to the end bin (purple line) and height of the object (pink line).

Members

Haptic Intelligence
  • Visitor
Haptic Intelligence
  • Postdoctoral Researcher
Haptic Intelligence
Director

Publications

Haptic Intelligence Article The Utility of Synthetic Reflexes and Haptic Feedback for Upper-Limb Prostheses in a Dexterous Task Without Direct Vision Thomas, N., Fazlollahi, F., Kuchenbecker, K. J., Brown, J. D. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31:169-179, January 2023 (Published)
Individuals who use myoelectric upper-limb prostheses often rely heavily on vision to complete their daily activities. They thus struggle in situations where vision is overloaded, such as multitasking, or unavailable, such as poor lighting conditions. Able-bodied individuals can easily accomplish such tasks due to tactile reflexes and haptic sensation guiding their upper-limb motor coordination. Based on these principles, we developed and tested two novel prosthesis systems that incorporate autonomous controllers and provide the user with touch-location feedback through either vibration or distributed pressure. These capabilities were made possible by installing a custom contact-location sensor on the fingers of a commercial prosthetic hand, along with a custom pressure sensor on the thumb. We compared the performance of the two systems against a standard myoelectric prosthesis and a myoelectric prosthesis with only autonomous controllers in a difficult reach-to-pick-and-place task conducted without direct vision. Results from 40 able-bodied participants in this between-subjects study indicated that vibrotactile feedback combined with synthetic reflexes proved significantly more advantageous than the standard prosthesis in several of the task milestones. In addition, vibrotactile feedback and synthetic reflexes improved grasp placement compared to only synthetic reflexes or pressure feedback combined with synthetic reflexes. These results indicate that autonomous controllers and haptic feedback together facilitate success in dexterous tasks without vision, and that the type of haptic display matters.
DOI BibTeX

Haptic Intelligence Conference Paper Sensorimotor-Inspired Tactile Feedback and Control Improve Consistency of Prosthesis Manipulation in the Absence of Direct Vision Thomas, N., Fazlollahi, F., Brown, J. D., Kuchenbecker, K. J. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 6174-6181, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2021 (Published)
The lack of haptically aware upper-limb prostheses forces amputees to rely largely on visual cues to complete activities of daily living. In contrast, non-amputees inherently rely on conscious haptic perception and automatic tactile reflexes to govern volitional actions in situations that do not allow for constant visual attention. We therefore propose a myoelectric prosthesis system that reflects these concepts to aid manipulation performance without direct vision. To implement this design, we constructed two fabric-based tactile sensors that measure contact location along the palmar and dorsal sides of the prosthetic fingers and grasp pressure at the tip of the prosthetic thumb. Inspired by the natural sensorimotor system, we use the measurements from these sensors to provide vibrotactile feedback of contact location and implement a tactile grasp controller with reflexes that prevent over-grasping and object slip. We compare this tactile system to a standard myoelectric prosthesis in a challenging reach-to-pick-and-place task conducted without direct vision; 17 non-amputee adults took part in this single-session between-subjects study. Participants in the tactile group achieved more consistent high performance compared to participants in the standard group. These results show that adding contact-location feedback and reflex control increases the consistency with which objects can be grasped and moved without direct vision in upper-limb prosthetics
DOI BibTeX