Exploring a surface with a handheld tool generates complex contact signals that uniquely encode the surface's properties-a needle hidden in a haystack of data. Humans naturally integrate visual, auditory, and haptic sensory data during these interactions to accurately assess and recognize surfaces. However, enabling artificial systems to perceive and recognize surfaces with human-like proficiency remains a significant challenge. The complexity and dimensionality of multi-modal sensor data, particularly in the intricate and dynamic modality of touch, hinders effective sensing and processing. Successfully overcoming these challenges will open up new possibilities in applications such as quality control, material documentation, and robotics. This dissertation addresses these issues at the levels of both the sensing hardware and the processing algorithms by introducing an automated similarity framework for multimodal surface recognition, developing a haptic-auditory test bed for acquiring high-quality surface data, and exploring optimal sensing configurations to improve recognition performance and robustness.

Machine learning and deep learning have been used extensively to classify physical surfaces through images and time-series contact data. However, these methods rely on human expertise and entail the time-consuming processes of data and parameter tuning. To overcome these challenges, we propose an easily implemented framework that can directly handle heterogeneous data sources for classification tasks. Our data-versus-data approach automatically quantifies distinctive differences in distributions in a high-dimensional space via kernel two-sample testing between two sets extracted from multimodal data (e.g., images, sounds, haptic signals). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique by benchmarking against expertly engineered classifiers for visual-audio-haptic surface recognition due to the industrial relevance, difficulty, and competitive baselines of this application; ablation studies confirm the utility of key components of our pipeline. As shown in our open-source code, we achieve 97.2\% accuracy on a standard multi-user dataset with 108 surface classes, outperforming the state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithm by 6\% on a more difficult version of the task. The fact that our classifier obtains this performance with minimal data processing in the standard algorithm setting reinforces the powerful nature of kernel methods for learning to recognize complex patterns. Note to Practitioners—We demonstrate how to apply the kernel two-sample test to a surface-recognition task, discuss opportunities for improvement, and explain how to use this framework for other classification problems with similar properties. Automating surface recognition could benefit both surface inspection and robot manipulation. Our algorithm quantifies class similarity and therefore outputs an ordered list of similar surfaces. This technique is well suited for quality assurance and documentation of newly received materials or newly manufactured parts. More generally, our automated classification pipeline can handle heterogeneous data sources including images and high-frequency time-series measurements of vibrations, forces and other physical signals. As our approach circumvents the time-consuming process of feature engineering, both experts and non-experts can use it to achieve high-accuracy classification. It is particularly appealing for new problems without existing models and heuristics. In addition to strong theoretical properties, the algorithm is straightforward to use in practice since it requires only kernel evaluations. Its transparent architecture can provide fast insights into the given use case under different sensing combinations without costly optimization. Practitioners can also use our procedure to obtain the minimum data-acquisition time for independent time-series data from new sensor recordings.

Sliding a tool across a surface generates rich sensations that can be analyzed to recognize what is being touched. However, the optimal configuration for capturing these signals is yet unclear. To bridge this gap, we consider haptic-auditory data as a human explores surfaces with different steel tools, including accelerations of the tool and finger, force and torque applied to the surface, and contact sounds. Our classification pipeline uses the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to quantify differences in data distributions in a high-dimensional space for inference. With recordings from three hemispherical tool diameters and ten diverse surfaces, we conducted two degradation studies by decreasing sensing bandwidth and increasing added noise. We evaluate the haptic-auditory recognition performance achieved with the MMD to compare newly gathered data to each surface in our known library. The results indicate that acceleration signals alone have great potential for high-accuracy surface recognition and are robust against noise contamination. The optimal accelerometer bandwidth exceeds 1000 Hz, suggesting that useful vibrotactile information extends beyond human perception range. Finally, smaller tool tips generate contact vibrations with better noise robustness. The provided sensing guidelines may enable superhuman performance in portable surface recognition, which could benefit quality control, material documentation, and robotics.

Causal inference could give future learning robots strong generalization and scalability capabilities, which are crucial for safety, fault diagnosis and error prevention. One application area of interest consists of the haptic recognition of surfaces. We seek to understand cause and effect during physical surface interaction by examining surface and tool identity, their interplay, and other contact-irrelevant factors. To work toward elucidating the mechanism of surface encoding, we attempt to recognize surfaces from haptic-auditory data captured by previously unseen hemispherical steel tools that differ from the recording tool in diameter and mass. In this context, we leverage ideas from kernel methods to quantify surface similarity through descriptive differences in signal distributions. We find that the effect of the tool is significantly present in higher-order statistical moments of contact data: aligning the means of the distributions being compared somewhat improves recognition but does not fully separate tool identity from surface identity. Our findings shed light on salient aspects of haptic-auditory data from tool-surface interaction and highlight the challenges involved in generalizing artificial surface discrimination capabilities.

The sophistication of biological sensing and transduction processes during finger-surface and tool-surface interaction is remarkable, enabling humans to perform ubiquitous tasks such as discriminating and manipulating surfaces. Capturing and processing these rich contact-elicited signals during surface exploration with similar success is an important challenge for artificial systems. Prior research introduced sophisticated mobile surface-sensing systems, but it remains less clear what quality, resolution and acuity of sensor data are necessary to perform human tasks with the same efficiency and accuracy. In order to address this gap in our understanding about artificial surface perception, we have designed a novel auditory-haptic test bed. This study aims to inspire new designs for artificial sensing tools in human-machine and robotic applications.

Sliding a finger or tool along a surface generates rich haptic and auditory contact signals that encode properties crucial for manipulation, such as friction and hardness. To engage in contact-rich manipulation, future robots would benefit from having surface-characterization capabilities similar to humans, but the optimal sensing configuration is not yet known. Thus, we developed a test bed for capturing high-quality measurements as a human touches surfaces with different tools: it includes optical motion capture, a force/torque sensor under the surface sample, high-bandwidth accelerometers on the tool and the fingertip, and a high-fidelity microphone. After recording data from three tool diameters and nine surfaces, we describe a surface-classification pipeline that uses the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to compare newly gathered data to each surface in our known library. The results achieved under several pipeline variations are compared, and future investigations are outlined.