Empirical Inference
This paper focuses on ethical aspects of BCI, as a research and a clinical tool, that are challenging for practitioners currently working in the field. Specifically, the difficulties involved in acquiring informed consent from locked-in patients are investigated, in combination with an analysis of the shared moral responsibility in BCI teams, and the complications encountered in establishing effective communication with media.
| Author(s): | Haselager, P. and Vlek, R. and Hill, J. and Nijboer, F. |
| Links: | |
| Journal: | Neural Networks |
| Volume: | 22 |
| Number (issue): | 9 |
| Pages: | 1352-1357 |
| Year: | 2009 |
| Month: | November |
| Day: | 0 |
| BibTeX Type: | Article (article) |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.046 |
| Digital: | 0 |
| Electronic Archiving: | grant_archive |
| Language: | en |
| Organization: | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft |
| School: | Biologische Kybernetik |
BibTeX
@article{5959,
title = {A note on ethical aspects of BCI},
journal = {Neural Networks},
abstract = {This paper focuses on ethical aspects of BCI, as a research and a clinical tool, that are challenging for practitioners currently working in the field. Specifically, the difficulties involved in acquiring informed consent from locked-in patients are investigated, in combination with an analysis of the shared moral responsibility in BCI teams, and the complications encountered in establishing effective communication with media.},
volume = {22},
number = {9},
pages = {1352-1357},
organization = {Max-Planck-Gesellschaft},
school = {Biologische Kybernetik},
month = nov,
year = {2009},
author = {Haselager, P. and Vlek, R. and Hill, J. and Nijboer, F.},
doi = {10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.046},
month_numeric = {11}
}