Back
Diverse and inclusive teams are not merely a moral imperative but also a catalyst for scientific excellence in robotics, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems point out in a study. The team now published an article in which they outline how a scientific community can benefit if its leadership fosters an environment of diversity and inclusion, and propose a leadership guide for roboticists to help reap these benefits.
Team diversity paired with inclusive leadership facilitates cutting-edge research and drives broad applicability.
Stuttgart – The field of robotics is highly interdisciplinary, encompassing disciplines such as mechanical and electrical engineering, materials science, computer science, neuroscience and biology. The robotics community in itself is a champion of academic diversity. If this academic diversity is paired with workforce diversity – incorporating members of different ethnicities, genders, socioeconomic statuses, ages, life experiences, parental statuses or disabilities – and inclusive leadership, it drives even more disruptive innovation and creativity in the sciences. Hence, promoting diversity and inclusion within research teams is not merely a moral imperative; it is a catalyst for facilitating cutting-edge research and accelerating progress in the field of robotics.
Drawing from literature, a comprehensive citation analysis, and expert interviews, a team of roboticists and behavioral scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Stuttgart and colleagues derive seven main benefits of workforce diversity and inclusive leadership for robotics research. On December 11, 2024, the team published a viewpoint article in Science Robotics which outlines these benefits and additionally serves as a leadership guide to fellow roboticists who wish to accelerate the pace of innovation within their own teams.
“In this article, we highlight existing scientific literature, analyze citation metrics of robotics papers over the past 25 years, reflect on our personal experiences and observations from working in a diverse and inclusive environment, and share insights from interviews with ten established research leaders in robotics”, says Daniela Macari, who is a doctoral researcher in the Robotic Materials Department at MPI-IS and first author of the article.
The authors identified seven main benefits of diverse and inclusive teams:
If robotics teams around the world embrace a diverse and inclusive environment and foster a sense of belonging and psychological safety, they may achieve higher levels of motivation and commitment to their work, resulting in increased productivity, more disruptive innovation, and maybe even most importantly – less bias in technology.
“Moreover, fostering such an environment, embracing diversity and inclusion within their teams, offers leaders the opportunity to grow into more effective and impactful leaders”, says Dr. Ksenia Keplinger, leader of the research group Organizational Leadership and Diversity at MPI-IS.
“Leading diverse and inclusive research teams challenges us to understand different perspectives and backgrounds, to customize our mentorship style to different group members, and to even adapt our research agendas to embrace new research thrusts aligned with team members’ skills and interests. While this requires constant effort and commitment, it yields long-term benefits in productivity and disruptive innovation for our teams”, adds Prof. Christoph Keplinger, Director of the Robotic Materials Department at MPI-IS.
The leadership guide the authors propose includes measures such as broadening recruitment pools, fostering a culture of inclusion, ensuring wide accessibility to resources, providing role models, and strengthening mentorship and allyship, among others.
Reference:
Daniela Macari*, Alex Fratzl, Ksenia Keplinger*, Christoph Keplinger*: Accelerating the pace of innovation in robotics by fostering diversity and inclusive leadership. Science Robotics [Vol 9, Issue 97], 11 December 2024, DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.adt1958
*Corresponding authors