Back
Young scientists regularly ask me for career advice. Academia or industry? Big company or startup? US or Europe? Good scientists in AI disciplines are fortunate to have many choices. But choosing can be stressful. I always give the same advice.
There is no globally-optimal life. There is no sequence of choices in life that will produce the "perfect life" or "perfect career". This is hard to accept but, once you accept it, it's very freeing.
So my advice is to choose the option that is the most fun. Why fun? Shouldn't you maximize future reward? Maximize future options? Maximize impact? Maximize income?
The best work I've done has felt like play. I get almost a giddy excitement from new ideas. There is nothing better than working with good people who share your excitement. If you can find a place where work feels like play, you're very lucky.
It's impossible to measure future reward/options/impact. Income is something you can measure in the moment, but not something I recommend optimizing beyond your basic needs. If you are fortunate enough to be a talented computer scientist in high demand, then money shouldn't be a worry. On a personal note, most of my best career decisions involved taking a pay cut to do something I found exciting.
So why optimize fun?
Here's the secret: if you take this approach, at the end of your career, you will look back and it will be a series of exciting choices. I don't know how to find a globally-optimal career but this is a pretty good approximation.
More information